Scandal with Hysakov: Activist Reveals the Origin of Millions of Dollars in His Cryptocurrency Wallets.

Scandal with Hysakov: Activist Reveals the Origin of Millions of Dollars in His Cryptocurrency Wallets
Scandal with Hysakov: Activist Reveals the Origin of Millions of Dollars in His Cryptocurrency Wallets

Nazar Hysakov's Explanation of the Origin of Millions of Dollars in His Cryptocurrency Wallets

Activist Nazar Hysakov explained that the money in his accounts was not his own. He received a certain share from unknown individuals who transferred money to his accounts, but he did not know who exactly used them.

“I do not know these people personally. People came to me asking for help to make money, so they transferred funds to my account. The deal was that I would have a share in this, and in this way I could get money for treatment. I received three or five percent,” Hysakov explained.

Hysakov also noted that he did not suspect that these funds could be of illegal origin, as they were withdrawn and distributed for treatment through exchangers. According to Lviv.media, over three years, several dozen transactions totaling more than 5 million dollars were conducted on Hysakov's cryptocurrency wallet.

Accusations and Public Reaction

It should be noted that Nazar Hysakov faced accusations of fraud after volunteers and journalists did not receive reports on the spending of the collected funds for treatment. The discovery of evidence of gambling and the turnover of millions of dollars in his cryptocurrency wallet led to further deepening of the scandal surrounding the activist.

Previously, funds were allocated for SMA treatment for Hysakov, but after new information about the activist's financial operations, public opinion became divided regarding the situation. Nazar Hysakov himself expressed his views on these accusations for the first Time.

The explanation of activist Nazar Hysakov regarding the origin of millions of dollars in his cryptocurrency wallets shocked the public and raised further questions about the sources of funding and their usage. The situation raises suspicions and reflections among the public, and the further development of events may have serious consequences for the activist and his reputation.

Read also

Advertising